KU Polling Place Change Stirs Controversy

Kutztown University isn’t actually in Kutztown but Maxatawny Township and students there have been voting on campus for a number of years.  The poll has been in the lobby and hallway of an athletic building with ample parking just outside.  It seems numerous complaints over the years from voters and poll workers prompted the Berks County Elections Commissioner Deb Olivieri to finally move the precinct four miles away to the Township building.  This happened when a suitable polling place became available for Maxatawny 1 which had been in the township building (out of the precinct) and now is in a church within its precinct.

Olivieri notified Tom Herman, Chair of the Berks County Democratic Committee, of the proposed switch on July 19th and on August 8th the County Commissioners (two Republicans and a Democrat often referred to as “the third Republican”) sitting as the Board of Elections approved the change.  Since then allegations of voter suppression arose as local Democrats saw the switch as an attempt to limit voter participation by KU students.

On the surface that might appear so as registered voters in Maxatawny 3 are comprised of 72% students at the University.  However when one looks at actual voter turnout it is abysmal except in presidential years.  In 2010 227 voters turned out but only 3 in that year’s primary.   2011 had 2 primary voters and 5 in the general.  2012 had 10 primary voters and 943 for the presidential general election.  This spring just one voter turned out for the primary.

As Commissioners Chair Christian Leinbach correctly pointed out college students generally have no interest in local municipal elections so those turnouts are very bad.  They do have interest in presidential races however and that is when KU students do turn out in large numbers.  Moving the precinct off campus and four miles away will have an effect in those races.  KU President Javier Cevallos has promised the Board the University will provide shuttle service to the polling place.  As long as the students are adequately informed about that availability I don’t this being a huge issue.

I’ve known Olivieri for years and she is a thorough and capable elections director and doesn’t do things on a partisan basis.   The thought that a Democrat would decide to disenfranchise fellow Democratic voters doesn’t make sense.  Berks County Democratic Chair Tom Herman had ample notice of the proposed change and had no reaction until after the fact and then shamelessly accused Olivieri of voter suppression.

The facts show that over eight years only 33% of the voter turnout in Max 3 were KU students.  If they really want a campus polling place perhaps they should vote more often and be more involved in the process.  I visit this polling place on election days because a local GOP committee person is known to practice active voter suppression there (like telling students if they vote they’ll lose their student aid) and I want to report on it if and when it occurs.  I never have trouble finding parking but have no personal knowledge of the physical facility because I don’t enter it.  I do know a lot of foot traffic into and out of the building are football players reporting for practice and other normal student activity not related to voting.  If this presents problems for poll workers moving the poll might make sense.  Olivieri obviously sincerely thought this change would be good.  Time will tell.

Update:  The numbers provided by Berks County Commissioner Christian Leinbach, which I quoted here, are NOT accurate according to the County’s own website.  For example, in the 2011 primary election Leinbach himself garnered 94 votes at Maxatawny 3.  I am trying to contact him for an explanation.

Update II:  Leinbach is claiming his numbers were for registered students on campus only.  He presented them as voter turnout figures.  I will check the video for exact quotes.  If he intentionally misrepresented these numbers at a public, televised meeting to justify previous actions this is a serious matter.

Berks County Investigating Johnny “Doc”

The Berks County Elections Board is investigating John Dougherty, Business Manager of IBEW Local 98 in Philadelphia.  The subject of the independent investigation, for which they hired outside counsel, is a $30,000 contribution the union made to the campaign of Reading Mayor Vaughn Spencer.  Commissioner Mark Scott spearheaded the action and fellow Republican Christian Leinbach voted with him.  Democrat Kevin Barnhardt abstained due to a conflict of interest.  Berks County DA John Adams seems to have opted not to investigate.

The gist of the investigation surrounds two $10,000 contributions the Spencer campaign gave to Bill Rubin and Bill Green.  Scott is claiming the $30,000 was provided to Spencer with the understanding that $10K each would go tot he two Philadelphia candidates.  A source tells me that the Spencer campaign requested $10,000 from Dougherty to pay for election day expenses but got $30K instead.  They opted to spread the rest around to other candidates on their own.  

Political committees spread funds around all the time.  It’s almost impossible to go through campaign finance reports and not see candidates and elected officials contributing to one another.  Leinbach got a contribution from Friends of Joe Pitts ($250 on 10/13/11) and Rafferty For Senate ($1,000 on 11/2/07) for example.

Most interestingly, if Scott thinks funneling money through other political entities is illegal he’s in trouble.  In 2007 he gave $32,800 to the Berks County Republican Committee (10/19/07).  Four days later the Republican State Committee of PA gave him an in-kind contribution of $32,430.80 (a direct mail piece).  Was that money laundering also?  Was there any collusion in the transference of those funds?  If Mark Scott thinks John Dougherty and the IBEW was laundering campaign contributions he’s guilty of the same thing by running money through two GOP Committees to pay for his campaign mailer.

I asked Scott about this today and he refused comment.  His face was another matter and said volumes.  Berks County taxpayers are wasting $8,000 on this bogus investigation.